Skip to content
Methodology checked September 2026

THE rankings, explained.

Times Higher Education publishes one of the most-cited university league tables in the world. Here is what it measures, what it leaves out, and how to use it without letting it choose for you.

How the World University Rankings are scored

Eighteen indicators are grouped into five pillars. The weights below are from THE's published methodology for the 2026 edition.

THE World University Rankings pillars and weights
PillarWeightWhat it measures
Teaching29.5%Teaching reputation (15%), staff-to-student ratio, doctorates awarded, and institutional income
Research environment29%Research reputation (18%), research income and research productivity
Research quality30%Citation impact (15%), research strength, research excellence and research influence
International outlook7.5%International students, international staff and international co-authorship
Industry4%Industry income and patents
  • Citation data comes from Elsevier's Scopus database; the reputation measures come from THE's own survey of academics.
  • To be ranked, a university must teach undergraduates and publish at least 1,000 research papers over five years.
  • Around 60% of the weight is research and reputation, so the table says little about teaching quality, class size or cost.

Read THE's full methodology ↗

The THE tables

  • World University Rankings

    THE's flagship table. The 2026 edition ranked 2,191 universities in 115 countries and territories, using 18 indicators grouped into five pillars. The 2027 edition is due on 30 September 2026.

    How to use it: A broad signal of research strength and global reputation. Most useful for research degrees and for comparing universities across countries.

  • Rankings by subject

    Eleven broad subject tables — including business and economics, computer science, engineering, and medicine and health — using the same pillars with weights adjusted for each field.

    How to use it: Usually more useful than the overall table: a university can be far stronger in your subject than its overall position suggests.

  • Asia University Rankings

    The same five pillars, recalibrated for universities in Asia.

    How to use it: Helpful for comparing Malaysian universities with others in the region.

  • Sustainability Impact Ratings

    Formerly the Impact Rankings. Measures universities' contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, with a table for each goal and an overall table.

    How to use it: Worth a look if you plan to study environment, public health or development, or want a university that is active in those areas.

  • Young University Rankings

    Universities aged 50 or under, with less weight on reputation, which older institutions naturally dominate.

    How to use it: A fairer view of newer universities, which often have modern facilities and strong industry links.

How to use rankings when choosing

  • Start with your subject

    Open the subject table, not the overall one. It is closer to the teaching you will actually receive.

  • Pick the measures that matter to you

    Graduate prospects and student satisfaction usually matter more to a master's student than research income.

  • Compare bands, not places

    The gap between 180th and 210th is usually noise. Treat universities in the same band as roughly equal and decide on course, cost and city.

  • Cross-check two tables

    Read THE or QS for global reputation and a national table like the CUG for student experience. If a university looks very different in each, find out why.

  • Never choose on rank alone

    Accreditation, total cost, visa rules, scholarship chances and where you want to work afterwards all come first. A ranking is one input to the shortlist, not the decision.

A ranking is one input. Your shortlist needs five more.

We weigh the ranking alongside entry requirements, total cost, scholarships, visa rules and graduate outcomes — and explain each choice in writing.